Odyssey PC 680 VS. PC 680MJ Battery

This section is dedicated to the new Rockster version of the R1150R.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
kiteman
Basic User
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 2:32 pm

Odyssey PC 680 VS. PC 680MJ Battery

Post by kiteman »

And now onto batteries........

Researching the forum and the net at large, it seems that the Odyssey may be the way to go (according to most/some?) for a replacement battery. The MJ seems to be a little bigger (encased). Has anyone fit it in the Rockster? Some have not been able to get the 680 battery in with the L brackets that are sold as an add on and others have had problems with the wires not being long enough without them. Anyone with any info? I am not sold 100% yet and would appreciate any advice anyone has. There seems to be mixed reviews of the OEM. I am hoping to take care of this right the first time and to put off dealing with this again for as long possible......

Thanks
'04 Roc 80th
Buckster
Lifer
Posts: 1189
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:53 pm
Donating Member #: 543
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: Odyssey PC 680 VS. PC 680MJ Battery

Post by Buckster »

I haven't bought one yet but it will be the pc 680. You can do a search on this topic and there is plenty of threads on this battery.
Buckster '03R
#543
duckdave
Double Lifer
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 2:23 pm
Donating Member #: 580
Location: Little Rock, AR

Re: Odyssey PC 680 VS. PC 680MJ Battery

Post by duckdave »

I put the PC680Mj in my Roadster (non-Rock) and it fit fine, but it was quite tight. I'm not sure if the batt holder in the Rock and Road are identical or not. The reason I got the MJ was they were out of stock on the regular one and sent the MJ for the same price. Got it in just a couple o days. IIRC, the MJ version is for Harleys, but don't say nothing 'bout that around my bike, OK. We've both been happy with the Odyssey so far.
-duckdave

'04 R1150R Silver
Little Rock 'n Roll
Double Lifer #580
kiteman
Basic User
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 2:32 pm

Re: Odyssey PC 680 VS. PC 680MJ Battery

Post by kiteman »

I went with the 680, it should be here today.
Thanks ,All.
'04 Roc 80th
Airman
Basic User
Posts: 1109
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 11:47 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: South of Seattle

Re: Odyssey PC 680 VS. PC 680MJ Battery

Post by Airman »

kiteman wrote:I went with the 680, it should be here today.
Thanks ,All.
You'll be happy with it. I didn't have the L-brackets with mine, but you don't really need them. I just made a few bends to the stock connectors and screwed them on. I found the extra capacity really turns the engine over quicker.....or my old battery was really shot. The old one was in there for five years, probably 2 years over the limit. It was starting to turn pretty slow when it was cold. I was charging it every day for safety.
I don't get caught in the rain, I ride in it on purpose.
User avatar
sweatmark
Septuple Lifer
Posts: 2236
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:11 am
Donating Member #: 208
Location: Oregon USA

Re: Odyssey PC 680 VS. PC 680MJ Battery

Post by sweatmark »

Battery cage for Roadster and Rockster are identical, like most of the bikes' parts.

You can smash the OE battery connectors to for the Odyssey - which is what I did for 680 is Mrs. Sweatmark's Roadster - but IIRC the positive lead can be coerced, while negative/ground is problematic. A simple DIY 90-degree angle to resolve the ground terminal problem can be hand fabricated from copper pipe, smashed flat, bent in a vise, drilled for nuts & bolts. Wish I'd done it that way the first time 'round.
Post Reply