beemerphile wrote:
I think we mostly do. It is just in the definition of "proper".
This reminded me of when I took the MSF's ERC course. I took the course a few years ago as it came as an compimentary reimbursement for buying a new Honda.
There were two instructors and they were the total opposites when it came regarding proper. During the quick emergency stop drill, I did a stoppie(only a foot or so off the ground, nothing in the territory of stupidity) and stopped on a dime. In far shorter distance than anyone in the class. The first instructor told me that it was an awesome display of brake control and commended me.
Then as they did with all the drills, our group rotated and I got the second instructor. I did the same thing. This instructor with his face turning red screamed at me for not being able to control my bike. This is not true as I had full control of the bike at all time. He said that I locked up the front momentarily and I am lucky that I did not crash.
Anyway, I see where you are coming from Beemerphile. Yes in 95% of the cases, the rear brakes probably do more harm than good, hence your advice. Howeve even if you are never going to use it, one should be totally familiar with the full potential of their rear brakes. One should always be conditioned to use the front/back in ways that are ideal for the situation The funny thing is, one time, I had to slam on the brakes on the highway as the guy in front of me slammed on his brakes as he realized he will miss his exit. I instinctively initially slammed on the front brakes only and then both front and rear once the bike slowed down somewhat(all this is of course in a fraction of a second).