Long Way Argument
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:08 am
Geez, I know this has been dealt with to death, but what the heck, it's the new year.
My father in law, a BMW rider of 45 years and I are having a substantial discussion (argument) about the Long Way Round series (that I bought on DVD).
His point is that these are two rich boys, not necessarily great riders, riding with a big support team, travelling hard roads that shoud be experienced hard-core. He believes that it's all about the money, that it's staged, and that, for "the real rider", isn't worth watching with little redeeming value.
My argument is that, aside from the obvious wealthy boy's behaving badly issue, that this really is a bit of a "pilot guide" program that shows what can be experienced on a touring machine to the general public--people who might at some point become bike afficionados. Further, I'd be hesitant to tour some of the areas they do, without some type of support . . . better to have someone come and save your bacon as opposed to losing a limb, being thrown into prison, or disappearing altogether. For the 70% or more of us that almost never take our bikes off a highway and don't tour for more than one or two weeks at a time, this program ends up being wishful thinking where we get a chance to live vicariously through a couple of guys who've got the money and connections to actually do this.
I've had this discussion with a bunch of my riding buddies and they are all slagging the program, but I sometimes think that secretly all these guys wish they had the opportunity to make that trip and it's a bit of sour grapes. I also wonder how many of us riders would do any better . . . with or without support team.
I guess if you are going to chronical 20,000 miles of riding, and want to do it in a format that you can actually broadcast to the masses you are going to make some sacrifices in terms of staying true to the so called "touring ethic". How many of you would watch McGregor and Boorman's home videos of the trip and not get bored . . . never mind the general public that doesn't know brake side from shift side.
In the end, these guys, no matter how rich and famous, and no matter what the financial motivation for the trip, did some reasonably hard riding, discovered some beautiful areas that they shared, and enlightened the non-riding public as to what can be experienced on a bike. This program does a service to getting new people into the passion of riding and touring and, for those of us who can admit it, makes a lot of us lust after their experience.
So . . . am I missing something here?
My father in law, a BMW rider of 45 years and I are having a substantial discussion (argument) about the Long Way Round series (that I bought on DVD).
His point is that these are two rich boys, not necessarily great riders, riding with a big support team, travelling hard roads that shoud be experienced hard-core. He believes that it's all about the money, that it's staged, and that, for "the real rider", isn't worth watching with little redeeming value.
My argument is that, aside from the obvious wealthy boy's behaving badly issue, that this really is a bit of a "pilot guide" program that shows what can be experienced on a touring machine to the general public--people who might at some point become bike afficionados. Further, I'd be hesitant to tour some of the areas they do, without some type of support . . . better to have someone come and save your bacon as opposed to losing a limb, being thrown into prison, or disappearing altogether. For the 70% or more of us that almost never take our bikes off a highway and don't tour for more than one or two weeks at a time, this program ends up being wishful thinking where we get a chance to live vicariously through a couple of guys who've got the money and connections to actually do this.
I've had this discussion with a bunch of my riding buddies and they are all slagging the program, but I sometimes think that secretly all these guys wish they had the opportunity to make that trip and it's a bit of sour grapes. I also wonder how many of us riders would do any better . . . with or without support team.
I guess if you are going to chronical 20,000 miles of riding, and want to do it in a format that you can actually broadcast to the masses you are going to make some sacrifices in terms of staying true to the so called "touring ethic". How many of you would watch McGregor and Boorman's home videos of the trip and not get bored . . . never mind the general public that doesn't know brake side from shift side.
In the end, these guys, no matter how rich and famous, and no matter what the financial motivation for the trip, did some reasonably hard riding, discovered some beautiful areas that they shared, and enlightened the non-riding public as to what can be experienced on a bike. This program does a service to getting new people into the passion of riding and touring and, for those of us who can admit it, makes a lot of us lust after their experience.
So . . . am I missing something here?