Pirelli Angel STs - anyone?
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 5:25 pm
Oh bugger - wrong forum ...
.. still, any of you guys with experience of these tyres (Yep, I know the R12R has a very different road feel to the Rockster)
These tyres haven't had the workout in R12R tyre "discussions" so much - has anyone used them for any real distance in the touring end of sport-touring? My personal criteria are (1) absolute consistency in "feel" from side to side - ie the tyre feels the same whetehr upright or leaned over (this is the defining characterisitic of the Z6 for me), (2) consistency in wet and especially braking in the wet; then (3) mileage - but I sometimes replace for age before I get to 12km (this change is one of the first for distance befroe age).
My non-dealer tyre guy is recommending them as a Z6 Interact alternative - he has lost or given up Metzeler. Pretty sure I'll go to the dealer and get Z6 Interacts beacuse they're a known quantity, but I am open to alternatives. (yep, I know about the cute image switch thing)
.. and before the PR2 guys chip in - I hate 'em. No, it's not rational. I had PR and PS on my F650CS and the whole feel of the tyre was wrong for me - they felt skittish. PR and Contis on the R12R test bike - felt squiggly too. Yeah, yeah, some of you call that "nimble", I know. It's a Michelin characteristic as much as consistency is a Metzeler one, and I've loathed it since the M48s on my new 1982 Ducati 900SS (chucked for Pirelli Phantoms) and I threw the 48 / 49s off my K100RT as soon as Metzeler developed the Marathon / Lazer combo.
oh gawd I sound grumpy today - shouldn't, since I had a great little blat into the city on my Vespa this morning (it has Pirellis) ... maybe it's an R12R thing
These tyres haven't had the workout in R12R tyre "discussions" so much - has anyone used them for any real distance in the touring end of sport-touring? My personal criteria are (1) absolute consistency in "feel" from side to side - ie the tyre feels the same whetehr upright or leaned over (this is the defining characterisitic of the Z6 for me), (2) consistency in wet and especially braking in the wet; then (3) mileage - but I sometimes replace for age before I get to 12km (this change is one of the first for distance befroe age).
My non-dealer tyre guy is recommending them as a Z6 Interact alternative - he has lost or given up Metzeler. Pretty sure I'll go to the dealer and get Z6 Interacts beacuse they're a known quantity, but I am open to alternatives. (yep, I know about the cute image switch thing)
.. and before the PR2 guys chip in - I hate 'em. No, it's not rational. I had PR and PS on my F650CS and the whole feel of the tyre was wrong for me - they felt skittish. PR and Contis on the R12R test bike - felt squiggly too. Yeah, yeah, some of you call that "nimble", I know. It's a Michelin characteristic as much as consistency is a Metzeler one, and I've loathed it since the M48s on my new 1982 Ducati 900SS (chucked for Pirelli Phantoms) and I threw the 48 / 49s off my K100RT as soon as Metzeler developed the Marathon / Lazer combo.
oh gawd I sound grumpy today - shouldn't, since I had a great little blat into the city on my Vespa this morning (it has Pirellis) ... maybe it's an R12R thing