BMW R1200R R1150R/T F800 K1200R R1100R/T R1250R RnineT Message Board

remus setup negatively affects the mileage probably because it is more fun to twist the throttle! that being said, i would never go back to not having it. remus setup makes the rock twice as fun to ride IMO.

Two weeks ago, I got reminded about the use of and need for a fuel light. Long story short: I ran out of gas on an exit of the German autobahn... I thought that I was safe because I had 'only' 286km (179 mls) on the gauge and I generally do better than that. My conclusion is that at high(er) speeds, the rockster quite likes a bit of fuel. To be more precise: 1 liter to 13.5km (32 mpg(US); 38 mpg(IMP)) is not strange. However, during that same vacation, when touring through the Italian Alps and bearly exceeding 90km/hr (56mph), but accelerating quite a lot , I hit a record of 1:18.4 (44 mpg(US); 52mpg(IMP))... Once, I managed to get 350km (218 mls) on a single tank of gas. The tank was not completely empty, but after my experience in Germany...

110 miles from fully fueled to fuel light ...

traffic lights are every couple of hundred metres ...

41-42 mpg city, 45-46 highway. When I get a bad tank of gas, it goes down to 38 or so. I try to use premium all the time and think it makes a difference.

The lowest octane number we can buy in Europe is 91 (only available in Germany). Rest of Europe: minimum (regular) is 95. The sticker on the tank also indicates minimum 95. I have tried to put premium Shell V-Power and the like from competitors with octane numbers up to 98 and 100 but see no difference in fuel consumption. Nice marketing from the oil companies, but I don't see a difference in my wallet.

I just bought a 2003 rockster and the first tank i fuel up riding in the city got me exactly 190 km (for the whole 20,4 litres tank) before the engine stopped!!

Is this good? I think not...i also own a 1999 r850r and gets me 250 km under the same conditions easily!!!

can you compare my consuption to yours and tell me what you think??

thanx in advance!

Well, about 2 or three weeks ago I went to Skyline Drive (VA) with some friends, and I was very impressed with my mileage.

Highway (>75mph average): 50.89mpg
Mixed: 45mpg
Stop and go (City): >40mpg

The lowest I have seen was 37mpg and that was because I got caught in a horrible traffic jam, which caused me to lost my patience, "forcing" me to rely very heavily on the throttle grip!

One of these days I'll post my account of the trip with pictures.

Paul

--------------
love my Rockster!!!!!!!!

I don't know if some Rocksters shipped with an Overdrive gear, but mine certainly didn't. My father had a 2003 R1150R Roadster, and in top gear it would cruise at very low RPMs (so low that a downshift was REQUIRED to accelerate at highway speeds). He used to get pretty excellent gas mileage.

Now I'm riding my '04 Rockster, with a 6th gear that feels very close to 5th. The manual listed it as the "SimplySport" transmission. I can accelerate in top gear, but mixed 85mph highway sprints and backroad sport riding will often yield 33mpg on a tank. Disappointing!

I rode a Triumph Sprint ST last week and averaged 45mpg over the course of a 30-mile sport ride through the twisties, averaging 50-85mph in 2nd and 3rd gear!

It was a little disheartening...

DocBlasto wrote:I don't know if some Rocksters shipped with an Overdrive gear, but mine certainly didn't. My father had a 2003 R1150R Roadster, and in top gear it would cruise at very low RPMs (so low that a downshift was REQUIRED to accelerate at highway speeds). He used to get pretty excellent gas mileage.

Now I'm riding my '04 Rockster, with a 6th gear that feels very close to 5th. The manual listed it as the "SimplySport" transmission. I can accelerate in top gear, but mixed 85mph highway sprints and backroad sport riding will often yield 33mpg on a tank. Disappointing!

I rode a Triumph Sprint ST last week and averaged 45mpg over the course of a 30-mile sport ride through the twisties, averaging 50-85mph in 2nd and 3rd gear!

It was a little disheartening...

Rocksters did not have the overdrive 6th available. I think it was an option on the Roadster to have it either way, but most I have seen have the overdrive 6th. It also seems that my Rockster has a slightly higher 1st gear than the Roadsters. It's probably just me. Sometimes I think it would be nice to have the overdrive 6th. I don't have any complaints with my mpg with the lower 6th gear. Usually average 45-50 mpg. I keep my bike in as good of a state of tune as I can though. I'm really anal about that stuff.

drevil wrote:remus setup negatively affects the mileage probably because it is more fun to twist the throttle! that being said, i would never go back to not having it. remus setup makes the rock twice as fun to ride IMO.

+1
i have the full remus system (y-pipe/cat eliminated) with a power commander and the smallest wunderlich screen. i'm only getting 32-33mpg. i keep the revs up in the twisties and i avg 80-85mph on the hgwy, with spurts of +90mph when needed...

and also agreed...fun, fun, fun!

I have a 14" Cee Bailey screen, full Remus w/RhineWest chip, weigh 210 lbs. As soon as the bike is warmed up, I flog it pretty hard. I get 39 mpg stop-n-go, and 46 running 80 - 85 mph on trips. I ran a lot slower my last tank because of the deer all over the place this time of year. It was 185 miles of a straight run between 65-70 mph; I got 50 mpg. Long live fuel injection.

04 Roadster