CycleRob wrote:To me, the stock amber lenses look better. I know, I'm the weird one. I never thought the clear lenses looked better when they first became the hip mod to do. The clear lenses just appear cheap looking to me. It's just not right. The amber color provides an appealing contrast with all the black in the area, whether it's lit up or not.
I absolutely agree with you. It's always been astonishing to me how susceptible any common visual accessory--whether it be tail lights or the width of a necktie--can be to the arbitrary dictates of fashion. Some creatively bankrupt designer decides to invert common sense and call it stylish, and suddenly the smart look you sported last season is unpardonably passe. In this case, I just have to ask: who decreed clear tail/turn signal lights to be the hot new look? Granted, I'm not sorry to see the passage of red tail lights, but the reason I like amber in the turn signals is that it's a DIFFERENT color from the internationally recognized red stop light or the white illumination from the headlight. Kinda helps other motorists to get a subliminal handle on your intentions, but apparently that was WAY too sensible to be allowed to continue. Personally, I think applying fashion to a safety feature is just plain wrong-headed, sort of like the prevailing design paradigm in chopper style that says lights of any kind are ugly and must be hidden, if not eliminated; and that functional braking is superfluous because a second disk in the front would hide the elaborate lacing in the off-road-sized 2"x21" wheel. Of course the now-necessary inner tube will cause the tire to run hotter, shorten its life, and be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to patch on the road--but hey, those bikes aren't for riding anyway, so w-t-h?
Yeah, I like the stock color too, and, btw, the amber dome/clear light bulb combo is considerably cheaper than the clear dome/colored light combo.
Your wallet is trying to tell you something.javascript:emoticon(':)')